I. In Focus This Wee
:Arial;”>EAC faces tough questions on Capitol Hill:10pt;”>Budget, performance get scrutiny in House Elections Subcommittee
:10pt; font-family:Arial;”>The continuing debate about the future of the :10pt; font-family:Arial;”> (EAC) recently found its way to a Congressional hearing room. Specifically, the U.S. Committee on House Administration’s Subcommittee on Elections held a :10pt; font-family:Arial;”> during which members not only questioned the specifics of the agency’s budget but openly wondered whether the agency has outlived its usefulness.
“As many of you know, I have serious doubts about the Commission’s purpose,” said subcommittee chair Gregg Harper (R-Miss.), citing the dwindling pool of federal dollars authorized for distribution by the EAC to the states under the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA).
Harper has introduced H.R.672, a bill that would terminate the EAC and transfer some of its responsibilities to other agencies.
On the topic of the EAC’s FY 2012 Budget Request of $13,715,665, Harper expressed considerable skepticism about that figure noting that 51.7 percent of the total budget – including approximately $5.4 million in overhead – represented management expenses compared to direct election programs totaling around $3.5 million.
He was not alone in his assessment.
After EAC Commissioner Donetta Davidson defended the 2012 budget proposal, Commissioner Gineen Bresso, who had experience overseeing the EAC during her tenure as elections counsel for the Committee on House Administration Republicans, agreed with Harper.
“I do not support the budget,” Bresso testified, saying she thought it “spends too much money on the bureaucratic infrastructure and not enough on agency activities and programs that assist state and local election officials and benefit voters.”
EAC executive director Tom Wilkey disagreed, arguing that the agency represents a “very low kept cost to the federal government,” and pointed to its rigorous voting system certification program which he said allowed states and localities to save millions of dollars at testing time.
Additionally, Wilkey argued that the EAC collects valuable information about elections. In particular, he cited the impending release of “the latest, most comprehensive data about the ballot request and return rate for overseas and military voters,” and would inform Congress about the impact of the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act of 2009.
Wilkey did agree that the EAC, like many other federal agencies, will have to learn to do more with less and become leaner and more efficient.
Budgetary issues are not the only challenges facing the agency and many of them got attention at the hearing. Members and witnesses all noted that two of the four EAC seats remain vacant, leaving a lack of quorum for even basic decisions. Harper noted that the National Association of Secretaries of State recently renewed its resolutions calling for the elimination of the EAC. Harper also submitted an October 2010 letter and a 2009 report from the Social Security Administration (SSA) alleging that the EAC has failed to submit a HAVA-mandated report (originally due in 2005) on the feasibility of using Social Security numbers to establish voter registration.
Following the hearing, Harper had not changed his view about the EAC’s future.
“What my colleagues and I heard again today was further confirmation that we need to eliminate the EAC, which has clearly served its purpose and is no longer essential to the administration of our elections,” he said in a press release reiterating his support for H.R. 672.
(Andreas Westgaard is a Pew Leadership Fellow.)
II. Election News This Week
- A report issued by a Fresno County, Calif. grand jury found that the county’s clerk was not to blame for long lines and confusion over where to vote on Election Day but that the county’s administrative officer and board of supervisors were to blame for cutting the registrar’s budget. According to the report, Clerk Victor Salazar had no choice but to eliminate 108 polling sites. County records show that funding for his office is down 40 percent from what it was five years ago. This caused thousands of voters to wait in long lines at the remaining 114 precincts, which were too small to accommodate the crowds. Many voters left without casting ballots. Others didn’t get a chance to vote because polling places weren’t properly identified and not easily accessible by public transit, the report said. Salazar told The Fresno Bee that he worked within the budget that was given to him by the board. He said the report vindicates complaints against him and his staff. Despite the cuts in Salazar’s office, the report said, “it appears the remaining staff is professional and dedicated to the concept of conducting fair, open and accessible elections subject to budgetary constraints.”
- A settlement between Cuyahoga County, Ohio and ES&S was reached this week. In July 2008, the board of elections approved a five-year, $13.4 million deal with Omaha, Neb.-based ES&S. The scanners were supposed to handle 17-inch ballots, but had trouble recording votes on part of ballots of that size. The county has used 14-inch ballots instead. The county will receive $200K in the settlement which covers the county’s costs of printing extra pages of smaller ballots in 2009 and last year, along with extra staff costs to test the scanners and for repairs to ballot boxes the county bought from ES&S.
- Voter ID Update: On Tuesday, the Alabama House of Representatives voted 64 to 31 to approve voter photo ID legislation. The bill moves next to the Senate. Late last week, a House panel approved voter photo ID in Arkansas. The legislation now moves to the full House. The Kansas Senate passed their own voter ID legislation this week and will now work with the House to resolve issues between the pieces of legislation. A North Carolina House subcommittee was expected to vote at press time to determine whether or not to move the Tar Heel version of photo ID forward. The debate was heated, but the Ohio GOP prevailed with photo ID legislation in the House. The bill moves next to the Senate, where, according to the Columbus Dispatch, Senate President Tom Niehaus, R-New Richmond, doesn’t regard it as a priority. A House panel in Pennsylvania heard testimony this week about the state’s latest attempt to require a photo ID to vote. Last time legislators voted from their hospital beds to keep voter ID from passing in Texas and while the debate was no less passionate this time around, on Wednesday the Texas House approved a photo ID bill. The Senate had previously passed its own voter ID legislation.
III. Research and Report Summaries
electionline provides brief summaries of recent research and reports in the field of election administration. Please e-mail links to research to email@example.com.
The High Cost of Voter ID Mandates – Common Cause Minnesota and Citizens for Election Integrity Minnesota, March 2011: This briefing paper examines the fiscal notes of proposed voter ID mandates in Minnesota and states that they greatly underestimate the cost of implementing ID requirements.
Technology: Hacking an election
Alabama: Voter ID
California: Top-two primary
Illinois: Number of precincts
Maine: Runoff elections
Nevada: Early voting
North Dakota: Voter disenfranchisement
Tennessee: Cost of paper ballots
Washington: Primary election
West Virginia: Satellite voting
Wisconsin: Recall elections
V. Job Openings
electionlineWeekly publishes election administration job postings each week as a free service to our readers. To have your job listed in the newsletter, please send a copy of the job description, including a web link to firstname.lastname@example.org. Job postings must be received by 5pm on Wednesday in order to appear in the Thursday newsletter. Listings will run for three weeks or till the deadline listed in the posting.